<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Smaller AquaDriver SkimClean</title>
	<atom:link href="http://glassbox-design.com/2009/new-smaller-aquadriver-skimclean/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://glassbox-design.com/2009/new-smaller-aquadriver-skimclean/</link>
	<description>the modern reef blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 17:21:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: AquaDriver Skim Clean with Wash Down System on ATB Large Cone &#124; glassbox-design.com</title>
		<link>http://glassbox-design.com/2009/new-smaller-aquadriver-skimclean/comment-page-1/#comment-5013</link>
		<dc:creator>AquaDriver Skim Clean with Wash Down System on ATB Large Cone &#124; glassbox-design.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 21:26:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://glassbox-design.com/?p=2334#comment-5013</guid>
		<description>[...] this the first Aqua Driver Skim Clean on an ATB Skimmer? It&#8217;s a question that&#8217;s difficult to justify given the distribution [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] this the first Aqua Driver Skim Clean on an ATB Skimmer? It&#8217;s a question that&#8217;s difficult to justify given the distribution [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richie Vos</title>
		<link>http://glassbox-design.com/2009/new-smaller-aquadriver-skimclean/comment-page-1/#comment-4035</link>
		<dc:creator>Richie Vos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 03:35:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://glassbox-design.com/?p=2334#comment-4035</guid>
		<description>@AgentSPS, I&#039;d feel like it would almost have too.

I wonder what&#039;d happen if you put a scoop on one of these, or ran it at an angle, seems like it could force bubbles over, acting somewhat like a wet skim.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@AgentSPS, I&#8217;d feel like it would almost have too.</p>
<p>I wonder what&#8217;d happen if you put a scoop on one of these, or ran it at an angle, seems like it could force bubbles over, acting somewhat like a wet skim.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AgentSPS</title>
		<link>http://glassbox-design.com/2009/new-smaller-aquadriver-skimclean/comment-page-1/#comment-4026</link>
		<dc:creator>AgentSPS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 23:26:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://glassbox-design.com/?p=2334#comment-4026</guid>
		<description>I wonder if having the wiper and parts in the neck of the skimmer affects the skimming performance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder if having the wiper and parts in the neck of the skimmer affects the skimming performance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CABEÇOTE LIMPANTE PARA SKIMMER &#171; Reefsimples - Blog de aquarismo do Roberto Pinto</title>
		<link>http://glassbox-design.com/2009/new-smaller-aquadriver-skimclean/comment-page-1/#comment-4005</link>
		<dc:creator>CABEÇOTE LIMPANTE PARA SKIMMER &#171; Reefsimples - Blog de aquarismo do Roberto Pinto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 11:55:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://glassbox-design.com/?p=2334#comment-4005</guid>
		<description>[...] http://glassbox-design.com/2009/new-smaller-aquadriver-skimclean/ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] <a href="http://glassbox-design.com/2009/new-smaller-aquadriver-skimclean/" rel="nofollow">http://glassbox-design.com/2009/new-smaller-aquadriver-skimclean/</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://glassbox-design.com/2009/new-smaller-aquadriver-skimclean/comment-page-1/#comment-3999</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 01:24:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://glassbox-design.com/?p=2334#comment-3999</guid>
		<description>Looks nice but i dont think i would ever use one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks nice but i dont think i would ever use one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richie Vos</title>
		<link>http://glassbox-design.com/2009/new-smaller-aquadriver-skimclean/comment-page-1/#comment-3979</link>
		<dc:creator>Richie Vos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 18:13:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://glassbox-design.com/?p=2334#comment-3979</guid>
		<description>Agree with Nicholas, $160-250, no way. Seems like a cool $20-30 gadget. In fact, I think I might go and buy a little rubber &#039;wiper&#039; for cleaning my skimmer manually.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agree with Nicholas, $160-250, no way. Seems like a cool $20-30 gadget. In fact, I think I might go and buy a little rubber &#8216;wiper&#8217; for cleaning my skimmer manually.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lexus</title>
		<link>http://glassbox-design.com/2009/new-smaller-aquadriver-skimclean/comment-page-1/#comment-3973</link>
		<dc:creator>Lexus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 16:12:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://glassbox-design.com/?p=2334#comment-3973</guid>
		<description>Great site, admin.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great site, admin.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nicholas Sadaka</title>
		<link>http://glassbox-design.com/2009/new-smaller-aquadriver-skimclean/comment-page-1/#comment-3967</link>
		<dc:creator>Nicholas Sadaka</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 13:13:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://glassbox-design.com/?p=2334#comment-3967</guid>
		<description>Great idea, but SOOOO expensive for basically just a time/effort saver. Just a little automation, not anything that I can see warranting spending that kind of money. Gotta have the bucks for one of those-they are cool though, don&#039;t get me wrong.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great idea, but SOOOO expensive for basically just a time/effort saver. Just a little automation, not anything that I can see warranting spending that kind of money. Gotta have the bucks for one of those-they are cool though, don&#8217;t get me wrong.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

