Entry

New Shark Cone Skimmers from JNS

JNS Aquaria, a reef aquarium equipment manufacturer from Taiwan, has unveiled their latest product line–the JNS Shark series of cone protein skimmers. These foam fractionators have taken design cues from a few brands, and are very reminiscent of the Bubble King Supermarin and the Reef Octopus Hurricone. Nonetheless this is a new style for JNS [...]

JNS-Shark-Skimmer-Sicce

JNS Aquaria, a reef aquarium equipment manufacturer from Taiwan, has unveiled their latest product line–the JNS Shark series of cone protein skimmers. These foam fractionators have taken design cues from a few brands, and are very reminiscent of the Bubble King Supermarin and the Reef Octopus Hurricone. Nonetheless this is a new style for JNS that shows promise as a serious performer. In the past JNS skimmers have been available in the U.S. under the Warner Marine label–no word if this will continue with the new Shark series, seeing as WM has their full cone skimmer already on the market. In Europe these are sold under a myriad of different names, with the most popular being the import house Terra Nova.

JNS Shark 3 in action

Shown in the top photo are the two models currently available; the SK-3 at left and SK-2 at right. Both models utilize the often ignored Sicce Syncra pump. These pumps, which are very similar to the Tunze Silence, have just begun to ship out en masse from the Italian manufacturer. We suspect they will become a popular alternative for skimmer and flow applications.

In the past the weakest part of JNS / WM skimmers were the Sedra pumps they used. Despite posting good numbers, the loud noise nullified any real pros that the inexpensive pumps brought to the table. The Sicce Syncra is a much needed improvement. Another improvement on the Shark Skimmer line is the JNS “Quick Precise” adjustment valve shown off in the video.

JNS-Shark-Skimmer

JNS Shark 3 (SK-3, In sump 2200)

  • Footprint: 38 x 29cm / 15″ x 12″
    • 58cm / 23″ tall
    • 200mm diameter body
  • Shark Cone SkimmerShark 3.0 Pump (modified Sicce Syncra)
    • 1020lph of air intake
    • 27w
  • 1.5″ Output with “Quick-Precise” adjustment valve

JNS Shark 2 (SK-2, In sump 1500)

  • Footprint: 33 x 20cm / 13″ x 8″
    • 58cm / 23″ tall
    • 200mm diameter body
  • Shark 2.0 Pump (modified Sicce Syncra)
    • 720lph of air intake
    • 22w
  • 1″ Output with “Quick-Precise” adjustment valve

So maybe extending the shark theme to the Sicce pump’s holder is a bit over the top…. but hats off to JNS for doing something different and memorable. They have a theme and they’re sticking to it.  Electric yellow tubing included free of charge

Related Posts

  1. ATB 840 Cone Skimmer Gets A Makeover – v1.5
  2. New ATB 1050 v 1.5 Cone Skimmer
  3. Warner Marine | K-1 Cone Skimmer
  4. MACNA XXI : New Deltec TC & SC Skimmers
  5. SWC | New Cone Skimmer Coming to the U.S.
  • C Win
    Good luck getting one!
  • reef
    Nice looking skimmer, Can't wait to try one.
  • Jon 'hahnmeister'
    Yeah, that was something I brought up when the final KZ patent (after heavy modification) was released. It was modified into something that actually covered the Supermarine more, if not the whole Bubbleking line all together (or any skimmer where all the plumbing is done at the bottom of the skimmer... so pretty much anything with a bubble plate).

    IF the patent were ever taken to court, I have a feeling it would get tossed out all together, but since the USPTO needs the money, they will stamp anything and let the lawyers battle out the 'fine details' later.

    The reality is that most smaller businesses would rather avoid the legal fees all together since it just adds to the overhead (kills margins) and isnt worth it. A court case where someone actually follows through is unlikely, not to mention, even if you are right, judges tend to favor those who have the patents. Going to court to contest a patent if you also have a patent gives you a fair shot. Going to court without a patent all together vs. someone who does puts you at a severe disadvantage.
  • x0man
    Jon 'hahnmeister'
    So does BK SM and RO
    doesn't it ?
  • Jon 'hahnmeister'
    It does fall under the KZ patent though since the base is a cylinder rather than full cone.
  • Nicholas Sadaka
    I agree with Chris-that's pretty cool.
  • The adjustment valve is really nice.
blog comments powered by Disqus