<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Warner Marine RX 150 Review &#8211; Final Thoughts &amp; Ratings</title>
	<atom:link href="http://glassbox-design.com/2008/warner-marine-rx-150-review-final-thoughts-ratings/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://glassbox-design.com/2008/warner-marine-rx-150-review-final-thoughts-ratings/</link>
	<description>the modern reef blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 16:28:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Travis H</title>
		<link>http://glassbox-design.com/2008/warner-marine-rx-150-review-final-thoughts-ratings/comment-page-1/#comment-2265</link>
		<dc:creator>Travis H</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 21:36:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://glassbox-design.com/?p=1201#comment-2265</guid>
		<description>I plan on putting a gate valve on the output so I can regulate the water level. 
I&#039;ll be able to lower the water level and crank up the air.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I plan on putting a gate valve on the output so I can regulate the water level.<br />
I&#8217;ll be able to lower the water level and crank up the air.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eric michael</title>
		<link>http://glassbox-design.com/2008/warner-marine-rx-150-review-final-thoughts-ratings/comment-page-1/#comment-2227</link>
		<dc:creator>eric michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2009 16:18:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://glassbox-design.com/?p=1201#comment-2227</guid>
		<description>Hi Travis,

The DAS outperformed the RX-150, used less wattage and was quieter. One AB pulls just over 500lph ~20 SCFH and the other just under 500. (The venturis to clog frequently, be sure that there is no salt built up etc.)

The biggest flaw on the EX-2 is the neck length and reducer. The neck is too short for 1000lph @ the set water level &amp; the reducer is very drastic and causes turbulence in the neck. I would attempt to fix those two things before attempting a bubble plate.

HTH.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Travis,</p>
<p>The DAS outperformed the RX-150, used less wattage and was quieter. One AB pulls just over 500lph ~20 SCFH and the other just under 500. (The venturis to clog frequently, be sure that there is no salt built up etc.)</p>
<p>The biggest flaw on the EX-2 is the neck length and reducer. The neck is too short for 1000lph @ the set water level &#038; the reducer is very drastic and causes turbulence in the neck. I would attempt to fix those two things before attempting a bubble plate.</p>
<p>HTH.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Travis H</title>
		<link>http://glassbox-design.com/2008/warner-marine-rx-150-review-final-thoughts-ratings/comment-page-1/#comment-2221</link>
		<dc:creator>Travis H</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2009 05:52:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://glassbox-design.com/?p=1201#comment-2221</guid>
		<description>So the your Das Ex-2 skims more then the rx-150?

Do you think the Ex-2 would benefit from the bubble plate? I run the ex-2 and see lots of turbulence in the skimmer. I&#039;m thinking up ways of putting some of the ideas off this skimmer into my Das.

How much air does your aquabee pumps pull per pump? I have never had a opportunity to measure mine.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So the your Das Ex-2 skims more then the rx-150?</p>
<p>Do you think the Ex-2 would benefit from the bubble plate? I run the ex-2 and see lots of turbulence in the skimmer. I&#8217;m thinking up ways of putting some of the ideas off this skimmer into my Das.</p>
<p>How much air does your aquabee pumps pull per pump? I have never had a opportunity to measure mine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eric michael</title>
		<link>http://glassbox-design.com/2008/warner-marine-rx-150-review-final-thoughts-ratings/comment-page-1/#comment-1884</link>
		<dc:creator>eric michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2008 23:26:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://glassbox-design.com/?p=1201#comment-1884</guid>
		<description>Hi Charles,

We switched back to our DAS EX-2, it is quieter, can be fed direct from the overflow, and draws more air at fewer watts.

I am not sure what skimmer we will be adding in the future. Conical designs are continually modified and changed, once some established external designs come out I&#039;ll evaluate then. A few laguna based designs are definitely on the radar  as of now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Charles,</p>
<p>We switched back to our DAS EX-2, it is quieter, can be fed direct from the overflow, and draws more air at fewer watts.</p>
<p>I am not sure what skimmer we will be adding in the future. Conical designs are continually modified and changed, once some established external designs come out I&#8217;ll evaluate then. A few laguna based designs are definitely on the radar  as of now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: charles</title>
		<link>http://glassbox-design.com/2008/warner-marine-rx-150-review-final-thoughts-ratings/comment-page-1/#comment-1874</link>
		<dc:creator>charles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 09:02:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://glassbox-design.com/?p=1201#comment-1874</guid>
		<description>Awesome review.  I was wondering, will you be switching back to the H&amp;S anytime soon or have you sold it?  What are your plans in terms of which skimmer you are going to settle for?  I would think for a set up as nice as yours you&#039;d want it to be quiet and based on your review, a 5/10 noise level sounds pretty unacceptable.  Any plans on going with a laguna-pump based skimmer?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Awesome review.  I was wondering, will you be switching back to the H&amp;S anytime soon or have you sold it?  What are your plans in terms of which skimmer you are going to settle for?  I would think for a set up as nice as yours you&#8217;d want it to be quiet and based on your review, a 5/10 noise level sounds pretty unacceptable.  Any plans on going with a laguna-pump based skimmer?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cp</title>
		<link>http://glassbox-design.com/2008/warner-marine-rx-150-review-final-thoughts-ratings/comment-page-1/#comment-1873</link>
		<dc:creator>cp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 06:34:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://glassbox-design.com/?p=1201#comment-1873</guid>
		<description>I am glad that you&#039;ve been kind enough to share your insight with us in such a thorough review.  As considerable effort was obviously put into the testing, troubleshooting and write-up, the least I can do is to say &#039;thank you.&#039;

As for Jake&#039;s question, I didn&#039;t see any harm in it.  I actually think your response adds some context to the review, as some of us are not fully aware of the details that you seem to have stated as a given.  Personally, I find too many skimmer threads rife with rah-rah brand cheerleading to be of much practical use.  A little discussion about how this product stacks up against the different approaches found in similar competing equipment is, IMO, a great addition to the review.

Regardless, thanks again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am glad that you&#8217;ve been kind enough to share your insight with us in such a thorough review.  As considerable effort was obviously put into the testing, troubleshooting and write-up, the least I can do is to say &#8216;thank you.&#8217;</p>
<p>As for Jake&#8217;s question, I didn&#8217;t see any harm in it.  I actually think your response adds some context to the review, as some of us are not fully aware of the details that you seem to have stated as a given.  Personally, I find too many skimmer threads rife with rah-rah brand cheerleading to be of much practical use.  A little discussion about how this product stacks up against the different approaches found in similar competing equipment is, IMO, a great addition to the review.</p>
<p>Regardless, thanks again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eric michael</title>
		<link>http://glassbox-design.com/2008/warner-marine-rx-150-review-final-thoughts-ratings/comment-page-1/#comment-1872</link>
		<dc:creator>eric michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 04:51:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://glassbox-design.com/?p=1201#comment-1872</guid>
		<description>Jake in the future, tone down the negativity a bit. I know you, and understand your personality, but others who do not know you, do not take your comments the same way. Something to be mindful of... it&#039;s not always what you say, but how.

The &quot;review&quot; is just to share with others, I was actually testing this new model for WM and they received the info long ago. This is not a full review but a follow up to other posts and private e-mail discussions with aquarists.

Some random points in regard to your comment:

Bubble size on needlewheels varies very little and has more to do with the water than the actual design of the skimmer and pump. Until mesh and higher RPMs are used the bubble size is pretty  much moot when dealing NW to NW.

Air water ratio on a recirculating skimmer that recirculates within the bubble chamber is also of very little use. Water throughput is key and up to the user. 

Raw performance data for skimmers does not exist and unfortunately will not for some time. Until a true standard and controlled test is done and we analyze what is removed, it is all subjective. Finally people in the industry are realizing there is more to skimmers than air draw.... a # I purposely left out and will be revisited in the future when compared with others.

And FWIW, wattage is listed 38-40w ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jake in the future, tone down the negativity a bit. I know you, and understand your personality, but others who do not know you, do not take your comments the same way. Something to be mindful of&#8230; it&#8217;s not always what you say, but how.</p>
<p>The &#8220;review&#8221; is just to share with others, I was actually testing this new model for WM and they received the info long ago. This is not a full review but a follow up to other posts and private e-mail discussions with aquarists.</p>
<p>Some random points in regard to your comment:</p>
<p>Bubble size on needlewheels varies very little and has more to do with the water than the actual design of the skimmer and pump. Until mesh and higher RPMs are used the bubble size is pretty  much moot when dealing NW to NW.</p>
<p>Air water ratio on a recirculating skimmer that recirculates within the bubble chamber is also of very little use. Water throughput is key and up to the user. </p>
<p>Raw performance data for skimmers does not exist and unfortunately will not for some time. Until a true standard and controlled test is done and we analyze what is removed, it is all subjective. Finally people in the industry are realizing there is more to skimmers than air draw&#8230;. a # I purposely left out and will be revisited in the future when compared with others.</p>
<p>And FWIW, wattage is listed 38-40w <img src='http://glassbox-design.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jake Adams</title>
		<link>http://glassbox-design.com/2008/warner-marine-rx-150-review-final-thoughts-ratings/comment-page-1/#comment-1870</link>
		<dc:creator>Jake Adams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 04:09:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://glassbox-design.com/?p=1201#comment-1870</guid>
		<description>Good to see you back online Eric. So did you just do a full skimmer review without mentioning this model&#039;s power draw, air intake, air/water ratio or bubble size? A full subjective review is nice for pointing out details but you really should include some raw performance data. Next time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good to see you back online Eric. So did you just do a full skimmer review without mentioning this model&#8217;s power draw, air intake, air/water ratio or bubble size? A full subjective review is nice for pointing out details but you really should include some raw performance data. Next time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
