• GBD videos on vimeo
  • subscribe : rss feed
  • Entry

    KZ Patent for Conical Skimmer Design Granted

    Korallen Zucht’s Revolution skimmer, designed by Chun-Chieh Liu, has been granted a patent. The patent was originally filed in June 21, 2007 and finally granted on November 4, 2008. This is creating uneasiness regarding other conical skimmer designs among hobbyists and manufacturers. The patent is far from flawless, but we will not know how it pans out [...]

    Korallen Zucht’s Revolution skimmer, designed by Chun-Chieh Liu, has been granted a patent. The patent was originally filed in June 21, 2007 and finally granted on November 4, 2008. This is creating uneasiness regarding other conical skimmer designs among hobbyists and manufacturers. The patent is far from flawless, but we will not know how it pans out for some time. 

    We’ll have an article in the future on patents and intellectual property in the aquarium industry, written by our close friend who happens to  be an intellectual property attorney as well as an avid reef aquarist! 

    In the mean time here are some links for those interested in further reading:

    Related Posts

    1. Planctonite’s Skimmer Fan & Tetra’s Patent
    2. EcoTech Marine Pump Patent Challenged: Request for Re-Examination Filed
    3. The Glassbox Goes Conical with new Skimmer
    4. Avast Marine DIY Cone Skimmer Makes Conical Affordable
    5. Ecoxotic’s Curvilinear Aquarium Light Patent
    • Andrew

      Does the patent really matter? Chinese productions have long ignored this and while other manufacturers around the world may choose to respect the patent it will surely by “violated” and conical skimmers will be made in China.

    • http://drakfisken.se Hans

      I would like to see more of what first attracted me to this site. And that was the modern design and reef aquarium combination. New equipment and rare fishes are nice too… but what happend with the design issue? And what is happening with your glassbox?

    • Jon

      I have been following it for some time now, and had some hot-shot patent lawyer buddies of mine in DC look it over, and I know Victor has had two opinions given as well from his lawyers as well.

      The KZ patent was rejected twice by the USPTO and revised so much that it no longer includes anything that would include the ATB designs. They came looking to patent the cone body, but instead, ended up with somethint very different. In short, KZ patent in its final form actually shares more with the Royal Exclusive Supermarine skimmers… and I cant imagine T. Pohl telling Klaus to stop making them… they are ‘partner’ companies under distribution. Besides, if you all remember some time back, Pohl gave permission to ATB in the Zeovit forums to make the cone skimmers because ‘he and Anton good friends… ATB small company (not even in US at the time)… not a concern’.

      Dont worry too much guys, I know ATB is covering their bases on this one. If anything, it would be in KZ’s interests NOT to restrict cone skimmers. Put it this way: they are complimentary products. For a long time, people questioned the bubble plate. Not until lower cost alternatives came along by other makers did this feature seem to really make sense and gain popularity. In short… if one company makes something with radical claims, others may question the claims. If more makers adopt the design though… then the feature gains public recognition and is accepted among more people. In short… KZ stands to make more money by letting other companies make cones as well. Just look at how the ATI Bubblemaster… not even an exact bubble plate copy… boosted interest and popularity of the BK’s. The same is true of the KZ’s. Sure, they may have to compete with ATB and some others, but those few will become the new ‘high-end’ which KZ alone cant do. Its alot like how restaurants are located close to each other… in clusters… they dont compete with each other as much as they keep people from going to the other side of town to eat. They are complimentary competition. I have seen it in other ‘low volume-high margin’ industries (most recently, paintball: look up Smart Parts vs. AKALMP vs. WDP of the UK and their electronic paintball gun patent disputes) where one company starts to get crappy with the rest… and as a result, everyone suffers, and consumers turn their backs on the ‘bully’ in the end.

      Regards,
      Jon

    • http://glassbox-design.com eric michael

      Jon,

      As always I respect and appreciate your opinion.

      I agree with much of what you’ve said, but many of your analogies are questionable at best. These are not complimentary products. Quite the opposite, they are substitutes. By having more products utilize the cone it may make aquarists more comfortable with the “technology”, but that is far from the benefit gained from complimentary products. That’s the learning and adoption curve of new technology, that can be sped up with the addition of competitors.

      If you believe that “KZ stands to make more money by letting other companies make cones as well”, I believe you are looking at some serious information bias. You cannot anchor KZ’s Revo sales on other companies that are using the said technology!

      While I feel other companies producing conical skimmers will not significantly hurt sales of the KZ Revo, they certainly are not going to help.

      You did make a very good point regarding bullying. Patents are relatively new to the hobby, and if KZ does enforce, they must do so with grace or risk alienation from potential buyers.

    • http://glassbox-design.com/2009/new-external-cone-skimmer-hits-the-market/ New Bubble Pioneer External Cone Skimmer | glassbox-design.com

      [...] For $380 you can purchase the Bubble Pioneer BP-CSE. It has a small footprint of 8.5″ x 8.5″ with a height of 21.5″. This model is powered by an AquaBee 2000 pulling just over 500lph. It’s a simple design with updated features like the cone body and direct pump feed. The actual body design of the BP-CSE is very similar to the KZ revolution cone skimmer. [...]

    blog comments powered by Disqus