<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: awt salt analysis</title>
	<atom:link href="http://glassbox-design.com/2008/awt-salt-analysis/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://glassbox-design.com/2008/awt-salt-analysis/</link>
	<description>clear thinking</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 21:59:02 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: e&#38;f</title>
		<link>http://glassbox-design.com/2008/awt-salt-analysis/#comment-499</link>
		<dc:creator>e&#38;f</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 22:20:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://glassbox-design.com/?p=111#comment-499</guid>
		<description>Well said gnarly. It seems every salt testing has significant flaws...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well said gnarly. It seems every salt testing has significant flaws&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gnarlyswine</title>
		<link>http://glassbox-design.com/2008/awt-salt-analysis/#comment-425</link>
		<dc:creator>gnarlyswine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2008 14:31:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://glassbox-design.com/?p=111#comment-425</guid>
		<description>Im afraid there results are of limited use, I dont think may aquarists add x grammes to y volume and leave it at that regardless of salinity. We continue to add until salinity is right so those samples that were low on slinity (likely had absorbed atmospheric moisture) are not representative of results the aquarist could expect.
Further little reference is made on any of the tests to NSW values. They can be obtained with some work but they could have given quoted values. Where they are provided (Bromine) they are in different SI units from the results.
My grading - could do better. From a testing company I would expect Much better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Im afraid there results are of limited use, I dont think may aquarists add x grammes to y volume and leave it at that regardless of salinity. We continue to add until salinity is right so those samples that were low on slinity (likely had absorbed atmospheric moisture) are not representative of results the aquarist could expect.<br />
Further little reference is made on any of the tests to NSW values. They can be obtained with some work but they could have given quoted values. Where they are provided (Bromine) they are in different SI units from the results.<br />
My grading - could do better. From a testing company I would expect Much better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
